When you're negotiating a settlement and the only issue left on the table is the final dollar amount, it's easy to get lured into splitting the difference. After all, isn't meeting in the middle fair? Maybe—but only if you're paying attention. In this article, we'll explore how to properly use the midpoint in negotiations, how to track shifting midpoints during multiple rounds of offers, and why simply agreeing to the midpoint can be a costly mistake.
If you're involved in negotiations—whether you're a legal professional, business owner, or mediator—understanding the midpoint in negotiations is essential. And if you're just looking for a quick way to calculate it, a midpoint calculator can help—but don't rely on it blindly.

What Is the Midpoint in Negotiations?
The midpoint is the numerical halfway point between two offers. For example, if Party A demands $100,000 and Party B offers $40,000, the midpoint is $70,000. Sounds simple enough, but here's where it gets tricky: the midpoint is only meaningful in context, and it can be manipulated.
Negotiators often make strategic opening offers with the intent of shifting the midpoint in their favor. So while using amidpoint calculator may tell you the math, it doesn't tell you whether the midpoint is fair.
The Danger of the Moving Midpoint
Midpoints are not fixed. Every time one party changes their offer—even slightly—the midpoint shifts. That can result in unintended concessions if you're not carefully tracking the history of offers.
Example:
-
Plaintiff starts at $100,000
-
Defendant starts at $40,000
-
Midpoint: $70,000
Then Defendant moves to $50,000. Plaintiff, thinking it's fair, responds with $90,000.
Now the midpoint is $70,000 again—but this time, it favors the Defendant. They've gained ground, and Plaintiff gave up $10,000 to keep the midpoint the same.
This is how parties can lose value round by round without even realizing it. To avoid this, track every offer and its corresponding midpoint. Don't just rely on memory—write it down or use a midpoint calculator to verify each round.
Negotiation Tactics for Dealing With Midpoints
1. Track Every Offer and Counteroffer
Keep a simple spreadsheet or notes that include each round of offers, the amount, and the resulting midpoint. This creates transparency and protects against anchoring.
2. Control the Anchor
The first offer often sets the tone and creates an “anchor” that frames the negotiation. If the opposing party opens too low or too high, consider pushing back before countering—don't let an unreasonable anchor dictate future midpoints.
3. Use Uneven Moves to Regain Leverage
If the midpoint is shifting against you, don't respond with symmetrical offers. Make deliberate, uneven movements that bring the midpoint back toward your target.
For example, if the midpoint shifts $10,000 against you, you might only move $2,500 on the next round to signal that your flexibility is tightening.
4. Set a Midpoint Target in Advance
Know the true value of your case or transaction and decide in advance what midpoint would represent a fair deal. That way, you can recognize when the midpoint crosses into favorable (or dangerous) territory.
5. Expose Manipulative Tactics
If the other party is clearly manipulating the midpoint with strategic offers, call it out—politely but firmly. This can rebalance the dynamic and bring the negotiation back to principled bargaining.
When to Split the Difference—and When Not To
Splitting the difference works best when both sides are bargaining in good faith and their opening numbers are relatively close. But if the first offer is a lowball or extreme, splitting the difference often rewards bad behavior.
Tip: If you're under pressure to “just meet in the middle,” ask: Middle of what? The midpoint of an unfair number is still an unfair number.
Use a Midpoint Calculator—but Don't Let It Do the Thinking
Using a midpoint calculator is a great tool for checking the math, especially in complex negotiations involving multiple rounds of offers. But remember, negotiation is a strategy game—not just arithmetic.
Before you agree to any midpoint, ask yourself:
-
How did we get here?
-
Is the midpoint based on reasonable, principled offers?
-
Does this midpoint reflect the value of the case—or just negotiation fatigue?
Final Thoughts: Be Mindful of the Math and the Psychology
The midpoint in negotiations is powerful—but it's also psychological. Many people are conditioned to think of the midpoint as “fair,” even when the starting points were manipulated. Smart negotiators use this to their advantage, but wise negotiators watch for it and protect their clients (or themselves) from being taken in by midpoint drift.
So the next time you sit down to settle a dispute and you're tempted to just “meet in the middle,” pause. Run the numbers. Track the offers. Ask who controls the midpoint—and why.
And if you're in doubt? A midpoint calculator can crunch the numbers, but only strategic thinking can close the deal on your terms.
About the Author

Steve Lopez, Esq. is a seasoned attorney, mediator, and negotiation strategist based in Southern California. He is the founder of the SoCal Mediation Center and has over 22 years of legal experience resolving complex disputes in real estate, probate, business, and family law. Steve holds a Master's Degree in Negotiation, Conflict Resolution, and Peacebuilding from California State University, Dominguez Hills. His advanced negotiation skills are the result of both formal academic training and decades of hands-on experience navigating high-stakes conflicts. He is also trained in cross-cultural and transformative mediation methods, allowing him to resolve disputes with precision, empathy, and strategic focus.
For more resources on negotiation strategy or to book a mediation session, visit www.socal-mediation.com.
Comments
There are no comments for this post. Be the first and Add your Comment below.
Leave a Comment